Xeon w9-3575X vs w5-3425

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w5-3425
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 270 Watt
23.82
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.87
+122%

w9-3575X outperforms w5-3425 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.2833.23
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,189$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-3425 has 57% better value for money than Xeon w9-3575X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)44
Threads2488
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 477 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes112112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w5-3425 23.82
Xeon w9-3575X 52.87
+122%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w5-3425 36726
Xeon w9-3575X 81519
+122%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.82 52.87
Recency 15 February 2023 24 August 2024
Physical cores 12 44
Threads 24 88
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 340 Watt

Xeon w5-3425 has 25.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 122% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 266.7% more physical cores and 266.7% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w5-3425 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w5-3425 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w5-3425
Xeon w5-3425
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon w5-3425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w5-3425 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.