i3-9100F vs Xeon X5698

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5698
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.17
Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.24
+95.4%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon X5698 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18441373
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.98
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.586.17
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5698 2.17
i3-9100F 4.24
+95.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5698 3447
i3-9100F 6733
+95.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.17 4.24
Recency 14 February 2011 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

i3-9100F has a 95.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-9100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5698 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5698 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5698
Xeon X5698
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Xeon X5698 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 7021 vote

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5698 or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.