Xeon E5-1603 vs X5687

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5687
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.35
+53%
Xeon E5-1603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.19

Xeon X5687 outperforms Xeon E5-1603 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15671837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.40no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.431.59
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)no data
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.86 GHzno data
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)10 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature80 °C64 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.6V - 1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching++
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size288 GB375 GB
Max memory channels34
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s31.4 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5687 3.35
+53%
Xeon E5-1603 2.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5687 5309
+53.3%
Xeon E5-1603 3463

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.35 2.19
Recency 14 February 2011 1 January 2012
Threads 8 4

Xeon X5687 has a 53% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Xeon E5-1603, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

The Xeon X5687 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1603 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Xeon E5-1603, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 53 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or Xeon E5-1603, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.