i3-9300 vs Xeon X5680

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5680
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.32
Core i3-9300
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 62 Watt
4.51
+4.4%

Core i3-9300 outperforms Xeon X5680 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13541311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.139.05
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency3.136.86
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date14 February 2010 (14 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$172$143

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-9300 has 119% better value for money than Xeon X5680.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.33 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size288 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5680 4.32
i3-9300 4.51
+4.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5680 6842
i3-9300 7137
+4.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5680 530
i3-9300 1441
+172%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5680 2501
i3-9300 3703
+48.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.32 4.51
Recency 14 February 2010 23 April 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 62 Watt

Xeon X5680 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i3-9300, on the other hand, has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 109.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300.

Be aware that Xeon X5680 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-9300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5680 and Core i3-9300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5680
Xeon X5680
Intel Core i3-9300
Core i3-9300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 331 vote

Rate Xeon X5680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 49 votes

Rate Core i3-9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5680 or Core i3-9300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.