Xeon W3530 vs X5677

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5677
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.17
+64.2%
Xeon W3530
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.93

Xeon X5677 outperforms Xeon W3530 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16041948
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.050.12
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.311.40
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5677 has 775% better value for money than Xeon W3530.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.46 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz3.06 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C68 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching++
PAE40 Bit36 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB24 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5677 3.17
+64.2%
Xeon W3530 1.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5677 5043
+64.2%
Xeon W3530 3071

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5677 510
+16.4%
Xeon W3530 438

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5677 2118
+38.2%
Xeon W3530 1533

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.17 1.93
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Xeon X5677 has a 64.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon X5677 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5677 and Xeon W3530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5677
Xeon X5677
Intel Xeon W3530
Xeon W3530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 49 votes

Rate Xeon X5677 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 41 vote

Rate Xeon W3530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5677 or Xeon W3530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.