A8-7680 vs Xeon X5670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.86
+72.3%
A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.24

Xeon X5670 outperforms A8-7680 by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5670 and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14531825
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0615.78
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesXeon (Desktop)AMD A8
Power efficiency3.834.69
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)26 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-7680 has 1389% better value for money than Xeon X5670.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5670 and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.93 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate6400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size239 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5670 and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5670 and A8-7680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB64 GB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R7 Series

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and A8-7680.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5670 3.86
+72.3%
A8-7680 2.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5670 6105
+72.3%
A8-7680 3544

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.86 2.24
Recency 16 March 2010 26 October 2018
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon X5670 has a 72.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

A8-7680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 111.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5670 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7680 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5670 is a server/workstation processor while A8-7680 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5670
Xeon X5670
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 474 votes

Rate Xeon X5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 511 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5670 or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.