EPYC 9845 vs Xeon X5667

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1649not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.92no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$13,564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)160
Threads8320
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature83 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366SP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 160
Threads 8 320
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 390 Watt

Xeon X5667 has 310.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 3900% more physical cores and 3900% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5667 and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5667
Xeon X5667
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 9 votes

Rate Xeon X5667 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5667 or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.