i5-760 vs Xeon X5482

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5482
2007
150 Watt
1.73
+4.2%
Core i5-760
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.66

Xeon X5482 outperforms Core i5-760 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20272066
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.10
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.091.65
Architecture codenameno dataLynnfield (2009−2010)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)18 July 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.33 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data296 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5482 1.73
+4.2%
i5-760 1.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5482 2755
+4.6%
i5-760 2633

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5482 433
i5-760 451
+4.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5482 1339
+5.8%
i5-760 1266

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 1.66
Recency 1 October 2007 18 July 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon X5482 has a 4.2% higher aggregate performance score.

i5-760, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760.

Be aware that Xeon X5482 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-760 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5482 and Core i5-760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5482
Xeon X5482
Intel Core i5-760
Core i5-760

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon X5482 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 753 votes

Rate Core i5-760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5482 or Core i5-760, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.