Core i3-7020U vs Xeon X3470
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X3470 outperforms i3-7020U by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1818 | 1998 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 96 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.75 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) | 10 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | BGA1356 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon X3470 outperforms Core i3-7020U by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon X3470 outperforms Core i3-7020U by 27% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.11 | 1.67 |
| Recency | 1 July 2009 | 10 April 2018 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon X3470 has a 26.3% higher aggregate performance score.
i3-7020U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
The Xeon X3470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-7020U in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-7020U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and Core i3-7020U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
