Celeron N2830 vs Xeon X3450
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1931 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.36 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | no data | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.16 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.41 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830.
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon X3450 outperforms Celeron N2830 by 419% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Xeon X3450 outperforms Celeron N2830 by 164% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Xeon X3450 outperforms Celeron N2830 by 425% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2009 | 23 February 2014 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 7 Watt |
Celeron N2830 has an age advantage of 4 years, and 1257.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X3450 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2830 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3450 and Celeron N2830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
