Xeon Gold 6426Y vs X3350

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3350
2008
95 Watt
1.42
Xeon Gold 6426Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 185 Watt
24.02
+1592%

Xeon Gold 6426Y outperforms Xeon X3350 by a whopping 1592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2188207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.16
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.4112.29
Architecture codenameno dataSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threadsno data32
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache37.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA775FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3350 1.42
Xeon Gold 6426Y 24.02
+1592%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3350 2263
Xeon Gold 6426Y 38159
+1586%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 24.02
Recency 1 January 2008 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon X3350 has 94.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6426Y, on the other hand, has a 1591.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 15 years.

The Xeon Gold 6426Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3350 and Xeon Gold 6426Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3350
Xeon X3350
Intel Xeon Gold 6426Y
Xeon Gold 6426Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon X3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6426Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3350 or Xeon Gold 6426Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.