Apple M1 vs Xeon X3350

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3350
2008
95 Watt
1.42

Apple M1 outperforms Xeon X3350 by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3350 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21901194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency1.41no data
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3350 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3350 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3350 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3350 and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3350 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3350 1.42
Apple M1 5.17
+264%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3350 2263
Apple M1 8207
+263%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.42 5.17
Recency 1 January 2008 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 264.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3350 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3350 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3350
Xeon X3350
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon X3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2236 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3350 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.