Athlon II X2 255 vs Xeon X3320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3320
2008
95 Watt
1.25
+68.9%
Athlon II X2 255
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74

Xeon X3320 outperforms Athlon II X2 255 by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22992664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.251.08
Architecture codenameno dataRegor (2009−2013)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)25 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3320 1.25
+68.9%
Athlon II X2 255 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3320 1986
+69%
Athlon II X2 255 1175

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 0.74
Recency 1 January 2008 25 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon X3320 has a 68.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon II X2 255, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 255 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3320 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X2 255 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3320 and Athlon II X2 255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3320
Xeon X3320
AMD Athlon II X2 255
Athlon II X2 255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 175 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3320 or Athlon II X2 255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.