i3-2330M vs Xeon X3230

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3230
2007
95 Watt
1.29
+67.5%
Core i3-2330M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.77

Xeon X3230 outperforms Core i3-2330M by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22702626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.292.08
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 July 2007 (17 years ago)1 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °C85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)
Number of transistorsno data624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCBGA1023,PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3230 1.29
+67.5%
i3-2330M 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3230 2052
+66.7%
i3-2330M 1231

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 0.77
Recency 1 July 2007 1 June 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon X3230 has a 67.5% higher aggregate performance score.

i3-2330M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2330M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3230 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-2330M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3230 and Core i3-2330M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3230
Xeon X3230
Intel Core i3-2330M
Core i3-2330M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 25 votes

Rate Xeon X3230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 357 votes

Rate Core i3-2330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3230 or Core i3-2330M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.