FX-4320 vs Xeon W3565

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3565
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.12
+7.1%
FX-4320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.98

Xeon W3565 outperforms FX-4320 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3565 and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18741939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.66no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.541.97
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date1 November 2009 (15 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3565 and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4096 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors731 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3565 and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3565 and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3565 and FX-4320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3565 and FX-4320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3565 and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3565 and FX-4320.

PCIe version2.0Not Listed

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3565 2.12
+7.1%
FX-4320 1.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3565 3375
+7.1%
FX-4320 3150

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.12 1.98
Recency 1 November 2009 23 October 2012
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon W3565 has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

FX-4320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W3565 and FX-4320.

Be aware that Xeon W3565 is a server/workstation processor while FX-4320 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3565 and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3565
Xeon W3565
AMD FX-4320
FX-4320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 81 vote

Rate Xeon W3565 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 138 votes

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3565 or FX-4320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.