Celeron 817 vs Xeon W3520

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1987	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.27	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	1.34	no data
Architecture codename	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	30 March 2009 (15 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$404	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	8	2
Base clock speed	2.66 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.93 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus type	no data	DMI 2.0
Bus rate	no data	4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	16
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	2 MB
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Die size	263 mm2	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	68 °C	no data
Number of transistors	731 million	504 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA1366	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
FMA	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817 are enumerated here.

VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	24 GB	16 GB
Max memory channels	3	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	4	2
Threads	8	2
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	17 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Celeron 817, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---