Turion 64 MT-32 vs Xeon W3505
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2673 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Turion 64 |
Power efficiency | 0.53 | no data |
Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
Release date | 30 March 2009 (15 years ago) | March 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.53 GHz | 1.79 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 263 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 731 million | 114 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.8V-1.225V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 1366 | 754 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32 are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon W3505 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 MT-32, on the other hand, has 420% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon W3505 is a server/workstation processor while Turion 64 MT-32 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3505 and Turion 64 MT-32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.