Celeron 1005M vs Xeon W3505

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3505
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.73
+4.3%
Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70

Xeon W3505 outperforms Celeron 1005M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26712702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.531.89
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.53 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.53 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size263 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.8V-1.225Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1366FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GB32 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3505 0.73
+4.3%
Celeron 1005M 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3505 1161
+4.8%
Celeron 1005M 1108

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.70
Recency 30 March 2009 1 July 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon W3505 has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 1005M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M.

Be aware that Xeon W3505 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 1005M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3505 and Celeron 1005M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3505
Xeon W3505
Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W3505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3505 or Celeron 1005M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.