Ultra 7 265T vs Xeon W-3375

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking86not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency13.04no data
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3820 (Icosa-Core)
Threads7620
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA41891851
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 38 20
Threads 76 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon W-3375 has 90% more physical cores and 280% more threads.

Ultra 7 265T, on the other hand, has a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 671.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 7 265T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
Core Ultra 7 265T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3375 or Core Ultra 7 265T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.