Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Xeon W-3323

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3323
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 220 Watt
16.60
+4.9%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
15.82

Xeon W-3323 outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking403442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency7.0152.48
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s54 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache18 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189FP8
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version4no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3323 16.60
+4.9%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 15.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3323 25875
+4.9%
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 24659

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.60 15.82
Recency 29 July 2021 1 October 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon W-3323 has a 4.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 685.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

Be aware that Xeon W-3323 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3323 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.