Xeon 6979P vs W-3275M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.03no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.61no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)120
Threads56240
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA36477529
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6496

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 28 120
Threads 56 240
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 500 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has 143.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6979P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 328.6% more physical cores and 328.6% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon 6979P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon 6979P
Xeon 6979P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon 6979P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Xeon 6979P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.