Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Xeon W-3275M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.35
+10.3%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
2023
14 cores / 14 threads, 78 Watt
22.98

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Apple M3 Max 14-Core by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking201226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WApple M3
Power efficiency11.7027.88
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads5614
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.06 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MBno data
L2 cache28 MBno data
L3 cache38.5 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and M3 Max 14-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.35
+10.3%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 22.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 40261
+10.3%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 36505

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.35 22.98
Recency 3 June 2019 30 October 2023
Physical cores 28 14
Threads 56 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 78 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 10.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 162.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the M3 Max 14-Core in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
M3 Max 14-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 67 votes

Rate M3 Max 14-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or M3 Max 14-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.