Xeon W-3275M vs W-3265M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.50
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.35
+17.9%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Xeon W-3265M by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking253201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.905.07
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency9.9211.70
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3265M has 16% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads4856
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2725
L1 cache1.5 MB1.75 MB
L2 cache24 MB28 MB
L3 cache33 MB38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size2 TB2 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 21.50
Xeon W-3275M 25.35
+17.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265M 34147
Xeon W-3275M 40261
+17.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3265M 997
Xeon W-3275M 1219
+22.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3265M 7681
Xeon W-3275M 12239
+59.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.50 25.35
Physical cores 24 28
Threads 48 56

Xeon W-3275M has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3265M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.