i7-13700F vs Xeon W-3265M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
22.09
Core i7-13700F
2023
16 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
25.43
+15.1%

Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon W-3265M by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking252202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.9254.37
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency9.8335.67
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353$359

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-13700F has 818% better value for money than Xeon W-3265M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 22.09
i7-13700F 25.43
+15.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265M 33800
i7-13700F 38923
+15.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3265M 997
i7-13700F 2684
+169%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3265M 7681
i7-13700F 15893
+107%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.09 25.43
Recency 3 June 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3265M has 50% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i7-13700F, on the other hand, has a 15.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-13700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3265M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3265M is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-13700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and Core i7-13700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
Intel Core i7-13700F
Core i7-13700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 478 votes

Rate Core i7-13700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or Core i7-13700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.