Apple M1 Pro vs Xeon W-3265M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.50
+98.5%
Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
10.83

Xeon W-3265M outperforms Apple M1 Pro by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking253721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.90no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WApple M-Series
Power efficiency9.92no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4810
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB2.9 MB
L2 cache24 MB28 MB
L3 cache33 MB24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and M1 Pro.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 21.50
+98.5%
Apple M1 Pro 10.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265M 34147
+98.5%
Apple M1 Pro 17201

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.50 10.83
Recency 3 June 2019 18 October 2021
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Xeon W-3265M has a 98.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 140% more physical cores and 380% more threads.

Apple M1 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3265M is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 Pro in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3265M is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and Apple M1 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 411 votes

Rate M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or M1 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.