Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon W-3245M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3245M
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
16.88
+34.8%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52

Xeon W-3245M outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking390623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.22no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency7.7939.47
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,002no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s37 MHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1 MB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TB32 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc Graphics 140V
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes644
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3245M 16.88
+34.8%
Ultra 9 288V 12.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3245M 26814
+34.8%
Ultra 9 288V 19895

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.88 12.52
Recency 3 June 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon W-3245M has a 34.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 583.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3245M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3245M is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3245M and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3245M
Xeon W-3245M
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-3245M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3245M or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.