Xeon D-2712T vs W-3225

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3225
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
11.25
+124%
Xeon D-2712T
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.03

Xeon W-3225 outperforms Xeon D-2712T by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6881214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4627.45
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency6.657.32
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-2712T has 120% better value for money than Xeon W-3225.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6432
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3225 11.25
+124%
Xeon D-2712T 5.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3225 17874
+124%
Xeon D-2712T 7990

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.25 5.03
Recency 3 June 2019 24 February 2022
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3225 has a 123.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon D-2712T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 146.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-2712T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3225 and Xeon D-2712T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225
Intel Xeon D-2712T
Xeon D-2712T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2712T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3225 or Xeon D-2712T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.