EPYC 7473X vs Xeon W-3225

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3225
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
11.38
EPYC 7473X
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
36.95
+225%

EPYC 7473X outperforms Xeon W-3225 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking72091
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.95no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency6.7714.66
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3225 11.38
EPYC 7473X 36.95
+225%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3225 18251
EPYC 7473X 59280
+225%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.38 36.95
Recency 3 June 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon W-3225 has 50% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has a 224.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7473X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3225 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225
AMD EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7473X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3225 and EPYC 7473X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.