i9-13900 vs Xeon W-2145

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2145
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
11.88
Core i9-13900
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
30.71
+159%

Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon W-2145 by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking677143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.7746.45
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency7.7422.40
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,113$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900 has 498% better value for money than Xeon W-2145.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size484 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket R4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2145 11.88
i9-13900 30.71
+159%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2145 18181
i9-13900 46991
+158%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-2145 1421
i9-13900 2764
+94.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-2145 7880
i9-13900 16615
+111%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.88 30.71
Recency 29 August 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

i9-13900 has a 158.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 12% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2145 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-2145 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2145 and Core i9-13900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2145
Xeon W-2145
Intel Core i9-13900
Core i9-13900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 32 votes

Rate Xeon W-2145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 116 votes

Rate Core i9-13900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2145 or Core i9-13900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.