Core i5-13400F vs Xeon W-1370P
Aggregate performance score
i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-1370P by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 426 | 389 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 44 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 57.73 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Rocket Lake-S (2021) | Raptor Lake-S |
| Release date | 6 May 2021 (3 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $196 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 0.1 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 9.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 276 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | LGA 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 50 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.58 | 16.30 |
| Recency | 6 May 2021 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-13400F has a 4.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 25% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F.
Be aware that Xeon W-1370P is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1370P and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
