Xeon W-3335 vs Silver 4316

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
19.73
Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
24.74
+25.4%

Xeon W-3335 outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking284200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency12.459.37
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4032
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPS-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335.

PCIe version4.04
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4316 19.73
Xeon W-3335 24.74
+25.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4316 31341
Xeon W-3335 39293
+25.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.73 24.74
Recency 6 April 2021 29 July 2021
Physical cores 20 16
Threads 40 32
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

Xeon Silver 4316 has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3335, on the other hand, has a 25.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

The Xeon W-3335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4316 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4316 and Xeon W-3335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316
Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4316 or Xeon W-3335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.