Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon Silver 4216
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Silver 4216 outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 574 | 662 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 19 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.72 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Intel Xeon Silver | no data |
Power efficiency | 12.28 | 31.34 |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Rembrandt-R (2023) |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,002 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.55 GHz |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 1 MB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 16 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 22 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | no data | 208 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 79 °C | 95 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | FP7 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR5-4800 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | no data |
Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 660M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 13.47 | 12.03 |
Recency | 2 April 2019 | 4 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
Threads | 32 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
Xeon Silver 4216 has a 12% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.
Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.
The Xeon Silver 4216 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7535HS in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Silver 4216 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4216 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.