Xeon Gold 6338 vs Silver 4214R

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4214R
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 100 Watt
11.50
Xeon Gold 6338
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
21.29
+85.1%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214R by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking674251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.92no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency10.889.83
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$705no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache12 MBno data
L3 cache16.5 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature79 °C81 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4214R 11.50
Xeon Gold 6338 21.29
+85.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4214R 18275
Xeon Gold 6338 33814
+85%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.50 21.29
Recency 24 February 2020 1 April 2021
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 24 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon Silver 4214R has 105% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6338, on the other hand, has a 85.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6338 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon Gold 6338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
Xeon Silver 4214R
Intel Xeon Gold 6338
Xeon Gold 6338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 11 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4214R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4214R or Xeon Gold 6338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.