EPYC 7443 vs Xeon Silver 4214R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4214R
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 100 Watt
11.97
EPYC 7443
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
37.06
+210%

EPYC 7443 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214R by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking65799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.6415.89
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.8916.86
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$705$2,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4214R has 68% better value for money than EPYC 7443.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2428.5
L1 cache768 KB1536 KB
L2 cache12 MB12 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4214R 11.97
EPYC 7443 37.06
+210%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4214R 18275
EPYC 7443 56601
+210%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.97 37.06
Recency 24 February 2020 12 January 2021
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon Silver 4214R has 100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7443, on the other hand, has a 209.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7443 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214R in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4214R and EPYC 7443, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
Xeon Silver 4214R
AMD EPYC 7443
EPYC 7443

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 11 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4214R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7443 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4214R or EPYC 7443, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.