Opteron 4386 vs Xeon Silver 4208

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4208
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
7.30
+157%

Xeon Silver 4208 outperforms Opteron 4386 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9701662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.36no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Seoul (2012)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KB384 KB
L2 cache8 MB8192 KB
L3 cache11 MB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647C32
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4208 7.30
+157%
Opteron 4386 2.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4208 11259
+157%
Opteron 4386 4378

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.30 2.84
Recency 2 April 2019 4 December 2012
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon Silver 4208 has a 157% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 11.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4208 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 4386 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4208 and Opteron 4386, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4208
Xeon Silver 4208
AMD Opteron  4386
Opteron 4386

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 38 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4208 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 4386 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4208 or Opteron 4386, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.