Celeron M 370 vs Xeon Silver 4116
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Silver 4116 outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 6113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 823 | 3317 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.35 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Silver | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 10.37 | 0.68 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (7 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,002 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 16.5 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 76 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.32 | 0.15 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 21 Watt |
Xeon Silver 4116 has a 6113.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 370, on the other hand, has 304.8% lower power consumption.
The Xeon Silver 4116 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Silver 4116 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 370 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
