Celeron M 370 vs Xeon Silver 4116

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	822	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.50	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	Intel Xeon Silver	Celeron M
Power efficiency	10.32	no data
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date	11 July 2017 (7 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,002	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	24	1
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	3 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus rate	no data	400 MHz
Multiplier	21	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	no data
L3 cache	16.5 MB (shared)	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	14 nm	90 nm
Maximum core temperature	76 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	8,000 million	no data
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
VID voltage range	no data	1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	no data
Socket	FCLGA3647	H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	-
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
TSX	+	-
Idle States	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	no data	32 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
FSB parity	no data	-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	-
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	no data
Maximum memory size	768 GB	no data
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	115.212 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	48	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	12	1
Threads	24	1
Chip lithography	14 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	21 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---