Opteron 6278 vs Xeon Silver 4114

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4114
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
8.25
Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.65
+4.8%

Opteron 6278 outperforms Xeon Silver 4114 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking919882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.31no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency9.197.12
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$694no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache640 KB768 KB
L2 cache10 MB16 MB
L3 cache13.75 MB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data316 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)4
SocketFCLGA3647G34
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4114 8.25
Opteron 6278 8.65
+4.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4114 13107
Opteron 6278 13733
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.25 8.65
Recency 11 July 2017 1 May 2012
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon Silver 4114 has an age advantage of 5 years, 25% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 35.3% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6278, on the other hand, has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 60% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4114 and Opteron 6278, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4114
Xeon Silver 4114
AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 23 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4114 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4114 or Opteron 6278, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.