Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
43.05
+134%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
18.38

Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.44no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.5838.65
Architecture codenameEmerald Rapids (2023)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,839no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores528 (Octa-Core)
Threads10416
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache300 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size2x 763 mm2178 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677FP7
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes8020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 43.05
+134%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS 18.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
+134%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS 29199

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.05 18.38
Recency 14 December 2023 16 April 2024
Physical cores 52 8
Threads 104 16
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8571N has a 134.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 550% more physical cores and 550% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8571N and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8571N or Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.