Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
43.05
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.06
+0%

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.4274.28
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency13.5132.43
Architecture codenameEmerald Rapids (2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,839$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285K has 613% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8571N.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5224 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads10424
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache300 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size2x 763 mm2243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA46771851
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes8020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 43.05
Ultra 9 285K 43.06
+0%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
Ultra 9 285K 68403
+0%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.05 43.06
Recency 14 December 2023 24 October 2024
Physical cores 52 24
Threads 104 24
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8571N has 116.7% more physical cores and 333.3% more threads.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 0% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 140% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8571N or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.