Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8571N
2023
52 cores / 104 threads, 300 Watt
43.05
+243%
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55

Xeon Platinum 8571N outperforms Core Ultra 5 228V by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking54620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.42no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency13.5869.86
Architecture codenameEmerald Rapids (2023)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,839no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores528 (Octa-Core)
Threads1048
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache300 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size2x 763 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC)DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes804

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 43.05
+243%
Ultra 5 228V 12.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8571N 68385
+243%
Ultra 5 228V 19930

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.05 12.55
Recency 14 December 2023 24 September 2024
Physical cores 52 8
Threads 104 8
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8571N has a 243% higher aggregate performance score, and 550% more physical cores and 1200% more threads.

Ultra 5 228V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 1664.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 228V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8571N is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 228V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8571N and Core Ultra 5 228V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8571N
Xeon Platinum 8571N
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
Core Ultra 5 228V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8571N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 228V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8571N or Core Ultra 5 228V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.