Xeon W-3365 vs Platinum 8368Q

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
Xeon W-3365
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
37.17
+26.5%

Xeon W-3365 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8368Q by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14788
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.3013.03
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3832 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads7664
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °C81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPS-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365.

PCIe version4.04
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
Xeon W-3365 37.17
+26.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
Xeon W-3365 59038
+26.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.39 37.17
Recency 6 April 2021 29 July 2021
Physical cores 38 32
Threads 76 64

Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 18.8% more physical cores and 18.8% more threads.

Xeon W-3365, on the other hand, has a 26.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

The Xeon W-3365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8368Q in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Intel Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368Q or Xeon W-3365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.