Xeon Silver 4416+ vs Platinum 8368Q

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.50
+1%
Xeon Silver 4416+
2023
20 cores / 40 threads, 165 Watt
29.20

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Xeon Silver 4416+ by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking147152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.27
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.3016.68
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,186

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3820 (Icosa-Core)
Threads7640
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °C82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA41894677
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4000
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.50
+1%
Xeon Silver 4416+ 29.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+1%
Xeon Silver 4416+ 46208

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.50 29.20
Recency 6 April 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 38 20
Threads 76 40
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8368Q has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, and 90% more physical cores and 90% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4416+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 63.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon Silver 4416+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
Xeon Silver 4416+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4416 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8368Q or Xeon Silver 4416+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.