i9-13900E vs Xeon Platinum 8358

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
34.26
+59.8%
Core i9-13900E
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
21.44

Xeon Platinum 8358 outperforms Core i9-13900E by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking111249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency12.9731.22
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA41891700
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8358 34.26
+59.8%
i9-13900E 21.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+59.8%
i9-13900E 34049

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.26 21.44
Recency 6 April 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 32
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8358 has a 59.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i9-13900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8358 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core i9-13900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358
Intel Core i9-13900E
Core i9-13900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i9-13900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8358 or Core i9-13900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.