Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
43.21
+9.5%
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.46

Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency19.9421.95
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (Zen 4) (2022)
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die sizeno dataCCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13140 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA4189AM5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes6424

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 43.21
+9.5%
Ryzen 9 7950X 39.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
+9.5%
Ryzen 9 7950X 62680

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.21 39.46
Recency 1 April 2021 27 September 2022
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8352Y has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7950X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8352Y is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8352Y and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1648 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8352Y or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.