Xeon Gold 5318Y vs Platinum 8260M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8260M
2018
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
21.39
+2.1%
Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
20.95

Xeon Platinum 8260M outperforms Xeon Gold 5318Y by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking254264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.95no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency12.2011.95
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date11 December 2018 (6 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,705no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data87 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size2 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 21.39
+2.1%
Xeon Gold 5318Y 20.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 33970
+2.1%
Xeon Gold 5318Y 33283

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.39 20.95
Recency 11 December 2018 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Xeon Platinum 8260M has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Gold 5318Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5318Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Xeon Platinum 8260M
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260M or Xeon Gold 5318Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.