Apple M2 Pro vs Xeon Platinum 8176

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8176
2017
28 cores / 56 threads, 165 Watt
15.15
+6.7%

Xeon Platinum 8176 outperforms Apple M2 Pro by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking483536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.31no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency8.37no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)no data
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,719no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads5612
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.75 MB3.3 MB
L2 cache28 MB36 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB24 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt2424 ‑ 3504 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8176 15.15
+6.7%
Apple M2 Pro 14.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8176 23179
+6.7%
Apple M2 Pro 21731

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.15 14.20
Recency 25 April 2017 17 January 2023
Physical cores 28 12
Threads 56 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 2424 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8176 has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, 133.3% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads, and 1369.1% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8176 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8176 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
Xeon Platinum 8176
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8176 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 170 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8176 or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.