Xeon Platinum 8481C vs Platinum 8173M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
17.50
+140%
Xeon Platinum 8481C
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
7.29

Xeon Platinum 8173M outperforms Xeon Platinum 8481C by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking355987
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiencyno data1.98
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data10 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads56112
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB105 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket P4677
Power consumption (TDP)no data350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 17.50
+140%
Xeon Platinum 8481C 7.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 28025
+140%
Xeon Platinum 8481C 11681

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.50 7.29
Physical cores 28 56
Threads 56 112
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Xeon Platinum 8173M has a 140.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Platinum 8481C, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8173M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8481C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon Platinum 8481C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
Intel Xeon Platinum 8481C
Xeon Platinum 8481C

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8481C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8173M or Xeon Platinum 8481C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.