Ultra 7 258V vs Xeon Platinum 8170F
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 624 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 68.40 |
Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 26 (Hexacosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 52 | 8 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 1.625 MB | 192 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 26 MB | 2.5 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 35.75 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | Socket P | Intel BGA 2833 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 768 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Arc 140V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 26 | 8 |
Threads | 52 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 17 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8170F has 225% more physical cores and 550% more threads.
Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 870.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8170F is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8170F and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.