Xeon W-3275 vs Platinum 8160M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
34.74
+29.9%

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Xeon W-3275 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking115188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.1211.50
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency21.1211.90
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,704$4,449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3275 has 88% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8160M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads4856
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2125
L1 cache1.5 MB1.75 MB
L2 cache24 MB28 MB
L3 cache33 MB38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1.5 TB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 34.74
+29.9%
Xeon W-3275 26.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 53158
+29.9%
Xeon W-3275 40931

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.74 26.75
Recency 25 April 2017 3 June 2019
Physical cores 24 28
Threads 48 56
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8160M has a 29.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 36.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon W-3275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M
Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160M or Xeon W-3275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.