Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Xeon Phi 7210F
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 442 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 52.48 |
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 256 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 3647 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 880M |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 1 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 8 |
| Threads | 256 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 28 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7210F has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 721.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 7210F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
